Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said the abuse of the IAEA reports by the US and three European countries created a pretext for Israel and the US to exploit the situation (IRNA)
TEHRAN, 6 Oct 2025: Iran has announced that it does not intend to immediately resume negotiations with European nations regarding its nuclear program in the wake of renewed sanctions imposed by France, Britain, and Germany.
The statement came from Esmaeil Baqaei, an Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman, who clarified on Monday that Tehran currently has "no plans for negotiations" and is carefully assessing the "consequences and implications" of the sanctions reimposition.
This development marks a significant escalation in tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear program against the backdrop of a deteriorating diplomatic framework intended to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions.
The fresh wave of sanctions was triggered by European powers invoking the "snapback" mechanism contained within United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, which endorses the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
This mechanism allows the restoration of previous UN sanctions if a party believes Iran is breaching its nuclear commitments. France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, collectively known as the E3, argued that Iran was in "significant non-performance" of its JCPOA obligations and thus moved to reinstate the measures.
The snapback restores restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities, including uranium enrichment and missile development, which had been lifted under the original agreement. It also reimposes an arms embargo and other economic sanctions aiming to pressure Tehran to return to compliance with international nuclear norms.
Iran's response has been defiantly negative, describing the sanctions as "unfair, unjust, and illegal," according to President Masoud Pezeshkian. Tehran has also announced its intent to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN nuclear watchdog, further straining international monitoring mechanisms.
Iranian officials accuse the European powers of bad faith, asserting that they violated the terms of the JCPOA by failing to deliver promised economic benefits after the United States' 2018 withdrawal from the agreement and subsequent reinstatement of American sanctions.
Tehran maintains that Europe's alignment with U.S. policies and its support for damaging IAEA resolutions have eroded trust and diplomatic goodwill. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has even suggested that these actions leave Iran contemplating withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), raising alarm about nuclear proliferation risks in the region.
The renewed sanctions and the breakdown in talks come amid a complex geopolitical landscape. China and Russia, both permanent members of the UN Security Council and parties to the JCPOA, have opposed the European push to reinstate sanctions.
They have argued that the snapback was triggered prematurely without exhausting all diplomatic dispute mechanisms. As key allies of Iran, they may seek to challenge or delay enforcement of the new sanctions, complicating global efforts to regulate Iran's nuclear program.
Despite the tensions, some diplomatic channels remain open. European leaders continue to express hope for a return to serious negotiations to resolve the nuclear standoff. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized that while sanctions send a clear message that Iran must be held accountable, diplomacy remains an option, urging Tehran to accept direct talks.
As the world watches, Iran's next moves will be pivotal. The immediate refusal to engage in talks signals a hardened stance by Tehran, which could lead to further isolation or, conversely, new diplomatic efforts to revive negotiations on mutually acceptable terms. The situation remains fluid, with global powers carefully weighing strategies to prevent escalation while monitoring Iran's nuclear developments closely.
This renewed impasse around Iran's nuclear program underlines the fragility of international agreements and the complex interplay of diplomacy, sanctions, and security in the Middle East. It also raises profound questions about the future of nuclear non-proliferation efforts in an era of shifting global alliances and persistent regional tensions.
.jpg)
0 Comments