Why Moscow Is Deepening Ties with Afghan Taliban?

Graphic: ChatGPT

Many believe Russia's growing military, economic and political engagement with Afghanistan's Taliban rulers marks one of the most significant geopolitical shifts in the region since the United States withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021.

What was once an unlikely relationship between a former occupier and an Islamist movement that fought Soviet forces during the 1980s has evolved into a pragmatic partnership shaped by mutual interests rather than ideology.

The latest signs of this transformation emerged when Moscow formally removed the Taliban from its list of terrorist organisations in April 2025 and later became the first country to officially recognise the Taliban government.

Neither Russia nor the Afghan side shared details of the military technical agreement, but to smooth fears among some of the regional powers, Afghanistan defence minister Maulvi Mohammad Yaqoob was quick in stating that signing a military-technical agreement with Moscow is not aimed against any country, but is intended to strengthen Afghanistan’s defense and security.

According to a statement shared by Islamic Emirate spokesman Mawlawi Zabihullah Mujahid, the Defense Minister said that Afghanistan is also open to discussing similar agreements with other countries that may be interested in cooperation.

Mr. Mujahid described concerns regarding the agreement as unfounded, emphasizing that the purpose of such cooperation is to support the country’s defense capabilities and national security.

Taliban-Russia Agreement

In May 2026, Russian and Taliban officials reportedly signed a military cooperation agreement, underscoring a deepening security relationship. These developments raise an important question: why is Russia investing so heavily in ties with a group it once considered an enemy?

Afghan officials claim trade relations between Afghanistan and Russia have witnessed significant progress over the past year, with the total volume of trade between the two countries nearly doubling. According to the latest figures released by the Afghan Ministry of Industry and Commerce, the value of bilateral trade increased from $296 million in 2024 to $590 million in 2025, reflecting a rapid expansion in economic cooperation between the two nations.

Security

For Moscow, Afghanistan is no longer viewed as a source of Taliban-inspired extremism but as a frontline in the fight against the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISIS-K). The Kremlin increasingly sees ISIS-K as the most dangerous militant threat emanating from Afghanistan.

This perception intensified after the March 2024 Crocus City Hall attack near Moscow, which Russian authorities linked to ISIS-K. Since then, Russian officials have repeatedly praised the Taliban's campaign against the group.

From Moscow's perspective, the Taliban controls the territory, possesses intelligence networks inside Afghanistan, and shares an interest in suppressing ISIS-K, which challenges both Taliban authority and Russian security.

Russian officials now openly describe the Taliban as a partner in counterterrorism rather than a threat. Security cooperation therefore serves a practical purpose: preventing instability from spreading into Central Asia and ultimately into Russia itself.

Regional influence

The collapse of the Western-backed Afghan government created a strategic vacuum. While the United States and its allies reduced their presence, regional powers moved quickly to establish relationships with the Taliban administration. Russia does not want to be excluded from shaping Afghanistan's future, particularly in a region it has historically regarded as part of its strategic sphere of influence.

Maintaining close ties with Kabul also strengthens Moscow's role in Central Asian security affairs. Russia remains a key security guarantor for several former Soviet republics, including Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. By engaging directly with the Taliban, Moscow hopes to manage cross-border threats before they destabilise neighbouring states. This allows Russia to present itself as an indispensable regional power broker despite the challenges posed by the war in Ukraine.

Economic interests also play an increasingly important role.

Afghanistan possesses substantial untapped mineral resources, including copper, lithium, rare earth elements, and other strategic minerals critical for modern industries. Although Afghanistan's security environment remains challenging, Russian policymakers recognise the long-term economic potential of these resources. Closer political and military relations improve the prospects for Russian investment in mining, infrastructure, transport corridors, and energy projects.

Furthermore, Moscow views Afghanistan as part of broader Eurasian connectivity initiatives. Improved stability could eventually facilitate trade routes linking South Asia, Central Asia, and Russia. Such projects align with Moscow's ambition to strengthen economic networks that bypass Western influence and sanctions.

Russia's deepening engagement with the Taliban must also be understood in the context of its broader confrontation with the West.

Since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow has sought to expand relations with non-Western governments and movements willing to engage with it despite Western pressure. The Taliban, isolated internationally and eager for diplomatic legitimacy, represents a willing partner. For Russia, recognition of the Taliban demonstrates an independent foreign policy that is not constrained by Western preferences. For the Taliban, Russian recognition offers international credibility and helps break diplomatic isolation.

This convergence of interests explains why both sides have steadily upgraded their relationship despite their troubled history.

However, Moscow's strategy carries significant risks.

The Taliban remains internationally controversial because of its restrictions on women, limitations on political freedoms, and human rights record. Most countries continue to withhold formal recognition. By embracing the Taliban, Russia risks criticism that it is prioritising strategic interests over international norms.

There is also uncertainty about Afghanistan's long-term stability. While the Taliban has consolidated power, economic hardship, internal factionalism, and the continued presence of extremist groups could undermine the country's security environment. If instability worsens, Russia could find itself associated with a government unable to deliver the stability Moscow seeks.

Nevertheless, current Russian policy suggests that the Kremlin believes engagement is preferable to isolation. Russian officials increasingly argue that the Taliban is a political reality that cannot be ignored. Rather than attempting to change the regime, Moscow has chosen to work with it.

Ultimately, Russia's deepening military ties with the Taliban are not the product of ideological alignment but geopolitical pragmatism. Counterterrorism cooperation, regional influence, economic opportunities, and strategic competition with the West have all pushed Moscow toward a closer partnership with Afghanistan's rulers. Whether this approach produces long-term stability remains uncertain, but it clearly reflects a broader transformation in Eurasian geopolitics—one in which former enemies are becoming strategic partners.

 

Comments